Fourth amendment landmark Supreme Court case surrounding warrant-less G.P.S tracking
Introduction In this weeks entry, I am going to be looking at a landmark U.S Supreme Court ruling using "stare decisis", meaning a precedent that was set this past summer in the world of privacy law, that has made it unconstitutional to perform wireless GPS tracking of potential suspects vehicles. I am going to briefly analyze two cases that have been decided upon (one by the U.S Supreme Court that you may have heard about on some I.T news sites about a month ago) and the other being decided upon in California by California legislators. Both of these events are significantly IMPORTANT and should not be ignored by those working in the field of law, law enforcement, all other parties involved, and may need to be included in future revisions to the F.B.I manual for prosecuting federal crimes. Let's begin by analyzing each case piece by piece, in order to fully appreciate and understand what each case means in the context of warrant-less wireless GPS tracking and what it me...